Precision is listed in Ludowici's manufacturer directory with Elite Crown Roofer certification, the program's top tier.
Manufacturer directoryVerify credentialOklahoma City, Oklahoma 73134
Crossings Community Church
Property archive
Document the campus section by section.
The recovered imagery shows a large connected campus with sanctuary, wings, gables and equipment areas. Image dates and visual labels must be confirmed against current property records before use as specifications.
The Precision difference
We build pretty roofs.
Specialty craftsmanship. Commercial scale. Care for the roof you already have. Precision brings tile, slate, copper and commercial roofing experience to a practical conversation about your property.
Precision websiteCompany profile checked 2026-10-05- Specialty craftsmanshipClay tile, natural slate, cedar, metal and custom copper details.Service source
- Churches & historic roofsPrecision's published St. John's Lutheran Church project combines Ludowici Provincial tile with custom copper work.Service source
- Commercial roof systemsRoof repairs and replacements for facilities, asset owners and multi-family communities.Service source
- Maintenance & documentationDiscuss a maintenance plan, roof assessment and a dated pre-loss photo record. If your roof was recently replaced, start with its existing warranty and maintenance requirements.Service source
Precision's homepage lists Ludowici Roof of the Year awards for 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021.
Company-published historical awardsVerify credentialPrecision identifies itself as woman owned and operated on its homepage.
Company websiteVerify credentialSelected work
Built proof, connected to its source.
Dallas, Texas
Preston Hollows · Berlin Residence
Ludowici clay tile + copperA custom tile blend with copper valleys, flashings, gutters and turret details. Precision's published project describes 122 roofing squares.View project sourceLubbock, Texas
Partain Residence
Vermont slate + custom copper220 roofing squares of green S1-grade Vermont slate on an 18/12 roof, with copper fabricated on site.View project sourceMulti-family community
The Villas of Capistrano
Clay tile · 2,500 roofing squaresA large community project covering tile removal, new sheathing, battens and tile installation. The website describes a retail bid project.View project sourcePublic recommendation summaries
What project partners put in writing.
A recommendation from a church client
The published recommendation describes a large, difficult roof project, expresses satisfaction with the result and recommends Precision's work.
Read recommendation sourceRecommended for repairs and replacements
The published recommendation endorses Precision and Brian Lemke for roof repair and replacement work.
Read recommendation sourceCustomer proof
Concise feedback from completed work.
Describes the team as professional and helpful, and says she recommended Precision to friends and family.
Ann-Marie WhiteCustomer proof sourceReports satisfaction with a Decra installation five years later and a prompt response when a minor issue arose.
Jim GouldCustomer proof source
Next step
Let's make the next step useful.
Review your roof history and priorities with your Precision contact. Agree a maintenance, documentation or assessment scope that fits the property.Company proof sources
- precision-homePrecision homepageChecked 2026-10-05
- precision-projectsPrecision published success storiesChecked 2026-10-05
- precision-recommendationsPrecision published customer recommendationsChecked 2026-10-05
- ludowici-profileLudowici manufacturer profile for PrecisionChecked 2026-10-05
The Precision difference
Why Precision
Ludowici Elite Crown Roofer. Specialty and commercial projects spanning custom tile, Vermont slate, copper and multi-family communities.- Manufacturer-listed Elite Crown Roofer
- Company-published Roof of the Year awards · 2016–2021
Discuss a roof assessment, maintenance plan or dated pre-loss record with your Precision contact.
Call Justen NewtonAccount map
Find the people who shape the decision.
Listed roles are research leads until the property confirms them.| Role | Person | Authority | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major-projects information routeDirector, Major Projects | Ryan Brown | Public staff role only; does not establish property, spending or signing authority. | S18 |
| Finance/administration information routePastor, Finance & Administration | Josh Klossner | Public staff role only; confirm whether this role participates in property review or approval. | S18 |
| Operations information routePastor, Ministry & Operations | Blake Bastin | Public staff role only; authority remains unverified. | S18S2 |
| Site-access and roof-record routeunknown | Person not verified | Ask the main office; no current contact or authority is confirmed. | S19LOCAL |
Lead with
Confirm the roof recordDo not infer current need from weather history.Start with
Jacob Gray or Richard WilsonListed October 1, 2026; confirm through the main office.First meeting
20-minute property conversationProposed duration; agree access and objective.Qualify
History, provider, authority, scopeNeed, condition, budget and appointment remain unconfirmed.Available record
Campus imagery + weather historyPreserved local sources; current condition is unverified.First question
What changed, and when?Confirm replacements, repairs, warranties and provider relationships.Potential next step
Agreed walk-throughDefine access and useful deliverables before proposing a scope.Decision path
Confirm with the churchContact roles and approval authority may have changed.Conversation frame
A large campus. Start with its current roof record.
Current-status discovery, then an agreed documentation scope
Property context
A property record to support the next roof conversation.
This overview assembles preserved campus imagery, remote roof estimates and an address-level weather record. A site visit and property records are needed to confirm roof systems, dates and current condition.
sq ft roof-surface estimate
Preserved remote estimate; verify from plans or field measurement.modeled roof segments
Existing geometry model; verify on site.visual roof-system categories
Legacy imagery interpretation; materials and installation dates unconfirmed.Information freshness
Checked 2026-10-05
- staff-directory retrieval date2026-10-05S18
- location-page retrieval date2026-10-05S19
- latest listed weather entry; record completeness unknown2026-06-26LOCAL
- imagery and geometry vintage varies or is unknownDate not recordedLOCAL
The local weather record lists provider-generated address-level hail and wind indicators. They are useful for asking when the roofs were last reviewed, but do not measure what struck this roof or prove damage, coverage, or claim eligibility.
Provider name, radius and coverage methodology are not retained in the supplied brief. · Unknown completeness after 2026-06-26; no on-roof validation.LOCALRoof record
Use the geometry to ask better questions.
The preserved brief classifies a standing-seam sanctuary, low-slope single-ply wings, and steep gables at the chapel and entry. These are visual interpretations from legacy imagery, not verified material schedules or condition findings.
- Roof surface estimate
- ≈201,147 sq ft
- Building footprint estimate
- ≈212,078 sq ft
- Modeled roof segments
- 97
- Average pitch estimate
- ≈25.1°
- Sanctuary
- Standing-seam appearance · verify material
- Wings
- Low-slope single-ply appearance · verify material
- Chapel and entry
- Steep gable appearance
- Current condition
- Not inspected by our team
Weather archive
Weather history is a prompt for documentation.
The preserved address-level record lists 20 event days from April 2023 through June 2026. It contains separate algorithm and meteorologist hail fields. Keep both values distinct and use the record to ask when roofs were last reviewed; it does not establish property damage.
listed event days
April 19, 2023 through June 26, 2026 in the local record.two listed hail fields
April 19, 2023: algorithm / meteorologist; neither is a field measurement at the roof.largest listed wind value
Appears on June 17, 2023, June 21, 2026 and June 26, 2026.| Date | Hail | Wind | Record note |
|---|---|---|---|
| June 26, 2026 | 1.0″ algorithm | 73 mph | Latest entry in preserved record; condition unverified |
| September 24, 2024 | 2.0″ algorithm / 2.5″ meteorologist | 60 mph | Separate listed fields; do not convert to an assumed measured maximum |
| April 19, 2023 | 2.75″ algorithm / 2.5″ meteorologist | Not listed | Separate listed fields; roof history at this date is unconfirmed |
Selected entries from source/storm_record.json preserved with the legacy brief. Values are address-level provider fields, not an on-roof measurement. Weather exposure is not proof of damage, coverage, claim eligibility or an insurance outcome.
Playbook
Turn the evidence into a useful meeting.
Use approved language, then listen for the owner’s actual priorities.Campus Roof Record Review
First conversation
Confirm roof-section history, warranties, provider and the records already available before recommending work.
LOCALRoof Documentation Baseline
Only if records or a site walk identify a useful gap
Create an agreed dated record for maintenance and future comparison; it does not assert damage or insurance eligibility.
LOCALCapital Roof Planning Scope
Only after lifecycle and decision process are confirmed
Organize confirmed sections and priorities for owner planning; no pricing or replacement conclusion is proposed.
LOCALMeeting talk track
- 1Opening
Did I catch you with 30 seconds? We prepared a preliminary profile because this is a large, multi-section campus. I am trying to confirm who manages roof history and storm documentation before we recommend anything.
- 2Discovery
Which person owns roof records, warranty files and the current provider relationship?
- 3Evidence
The available record combines remote geometry and address-level weather indicators; it does not establish roof condition or damage.
- 4Offer
A 20-minute roof-record review can identify whether the records are complete or whether a scoped walk-through would be useful.
- 5Close
Who should join that review, and what would make it useful?
Common objections
We already have a roofer.
That relationship should be respected. We would first identify whether the existing records and maintenance process already cover the need.
We have no problems.
That is good to hear. The weather record does not say otherwise; the question is only whether the roof record is complete enough for future maintenance and planning.
Send something.
I can send a concise list of the records a review would cover, then you can decide whether a conversation is useful.
Is this an insurance claim call?
No. A dated record may support later discussions, but it does not determine coverage, payment or claim eligibility.
Voicemail
Hi, this is Justen Newton with Precision Construction & Roofing. I am trying to confirm who manages roof records for the OKC campus. We prepared a preliminary profile and can use a short review to determine whether any documentation work is useful. Please call me at 239-791-0646.
Close the loop
If this is not your area, who owns roof records or site access? If the record is already complete, may I close this inquiry and check back only with permission?
Ten-business-day sequence
- Day 1Route
Who currently owns roof records and site-access coordination for the OKC campus?
- Day 2Voicemail
I prepared a preliminary roof-record profile and would like to confirm the right records contact before recommending anything.
- Day 3Email
Could we schedule a 20-minute roof-record review to confirm sections, warranties and documentation already on file?
- Day 4Research hygiene
Update only from a confirmed public or office-provided route; do not infer a decision-maker.
- Day 5Second call
The preliminary profile suggests a large multi-section campus; who can confirm the current roof history?
- Day 6Leave-behind offer
I can send a one-page list of the records we would review; no inspection or service commitment is implied.
- Day 7Access qualification
If a review is useful, who should confirm access, meeting participants and existing provider requirements?
- Day 8Value check
If the current record is complete, we will document that and close the loop rather than force a scope.
- Day 9Close loop
Should I speak with someone else, revisit during planning, or close this inquiry for now?
- Day 10Nurture permission
May I retain the office route for a future records-planning check-in?
Defined owner deliverables
- A one-page roof-record review summary: sections discussed, available documents and confirmed gaps.
- If authorized after review: a scoped photo log and roof-area inventory with dates and observed conditions.
- If requested: a planning scope identifying information needed before maintenance or capital decisions.
Activity
Record the outcome and next commitment.
Checking for shared activity…Recent activity
- No activity has been recorded.
Hosted pages use the protected account activity record. Standalone files save only on this device. A shared-login display name is unverified.
October 5, 2026